I mentioned a week ago, that if your book offers “if/reverses, inch you can play those instead of parlays. Some of you may not know how to bet an “if/reverse. inch A full explanation and comparison of “if” table bets, “if/reverses, inch and parlays follows, along with the situations in which each is best..
An “if” bet is what it really sounds like. You bet Team A and if it wins then you place an equal amount on Team B. A parlay with two games going off at different times is a variety of “if” bet in which you bet on the first team, and if it wins you bet double on the second team. With a true “if” bet, instead of bets double on the second team, you bet an equal amount on the second team.
You can avoid two calls to the bookmaker and lock in the present line on a later game by telling your bookmaker you want to make an “if” bet. “If” table bets can also be made on two games throwing off at the same time. The bookmaker will wait prior to the first bandar slot game is over. If the first game wins, he will put an equal amount on the second game community . was already played.
Although an “if” bet is actually two straight table bets at normal vig, you cannot decide later that you no longer want the second bet. Once you make an “if” bet, the second bet cannot be terminated, even if the second game haven’t gone off yet. If the first game wins, you will have action on the second game. For that reason, there is less control over an “if” bet than over two straight table bets. When the two games you bet overlap in time, however, the only way to bet one as long as another wins is by placing an “if” bet. Of course, when two games overlap in time, cancellation of the second game bet is no problem. It ought to be noted, anytime the two games start at different times, most books will not allow you to fill the second game later. You must specify both teams when you make the bet.
You can make an “if” bet by saying to the bookmaker, “I want to make an ‘if’ bet, inch and then, “Give me Team A IF Team B for $100. inch Giving your bookmaker that instruction would be the just like bets $110 to win $100 on Team A, and then, as long as Team A wins, bets another $110 to win $100 on Team B.
If the first team in the “if” bet seems to lose, there is no bet on the second team. No matter whether the second team wins of seems to lose, your total loss on the “if” bet would be $110 when you lose on the first team. If the first team wins, however, you would have a bet of $110 to win $100 going on the second team. In that case, if the second team seems to lose, your total loss would be just the $10 of vig on the split of the two teams. If both games win, you would win $100 on Team A and $100 on Team B, for a total win of $200. Thus, the most loss on an “if” would be $110, and the maximum win would be $200. This is balanced by the disadvantage of losing the full $110, rather than $10 of vig, every time the teams split with the first team in the bet losing.
As you can see, it matters a great deal which game you put first in an “if” bet. If you put the loser first in a split, then you lose your full bet. If you split but the loser is the second team in the bet, then you only lose the vig.
Bettors soon learned that the way to avoid the uncertainty caused by the order of wins and seems to lose is to make two “if” table bets putting each team first. Instead of bets $110 on inch Team A if Team B, inch you would bet just $55 on inch Team A if Team B. inch and then make a second “if” bet preventing the order of the teams for another $55. The second bet would put Team B first and Team A second. This type of double bet, preventing the order of the same two teams, is called an “if/reverse” or sometimes just a “reverse. inch
A “reverse” is two separate “if” table bets:
Team A if Team B for $55 to win $50; and
Team B if Team A for $55 to win $50.
You should not state both table bets. You merely tell the clerk you want to bet a “reverse, inch the two teams, and the amount.
If both teams win, the result would be the same as you played a single “if” bet for $100. You win $50 on Team A in the first “if bet, and then $50 on Team B, for a total win of $100. In the second “if” bet, you win $50 on Team B, and then $50 on Team A, for a total win of $100. The two “if” table bets together cause a total win of $200 when both teams win.
If both teams lose, the result would also be the same as if you played a single “if” bet for $100. Team A’s loss would cost you $55 in the first “if” combination, and nothing would go onto Team B. In the second combination, Team B’s loss would cost you $55 and nothing would go onto to Team A. You would lose $55 on all the table bets for a total maximum loss of $110 whenever both teams lose.
The difference occurs when the teams split. Instead of losing $110 when the first team seems to lose and the second wins, and $10 when the first team wins but the second seems to lose, in the reverse you will lose $60 on a split no matter which team wins and which seems to lose. It computes this way. If Team A seems to lose you will lose $55 on the first combination, and have nothing going on the winning Team B. In the second combination, you will win $50 on Team B, and have action on Team A for a $55 loss, producing a net loss on the second combination of $5 vig. Losing $55 on the first “if” bet and $5 on the second “if” bet gives you a combined loss of $60 on the “reverse. inch When Team B seems to lose, you will lose the $5 vig on the first combination and the $55 on the second combination for the same $60 on the split..
We have accomplished this smaller loss of $60 instead of $110 when the first team seems to lose with no reduction in the win when both teams win. In the single $110 “if” bet and the two reversed “if” table bets for $55, the win is $200 when both teams cover the spread. The bookmakers would not put themselves at that sort of disadvantage, however. The gain of $50 whenever Team A seems to lose is fully offset by the extra $50 loss ($60 instead of $10) whenever Team B is the loser. Thus, the “reverse” doesn’t actually save us hardly any money, but it does have the main benefit of making the risk more predictable, and avoiding the worry as to which team to put first in the “if” bet.